<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama&#8217;s Love/Hate Relationship with Toxic Mercury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blatantreality.com/2008/07/30/barack-obamas-lovehate-relationship-with-toxic-mercury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blatantreality.com/2008/07/30/barack-obamas-lovehate-relationship-with-toxic-mercury/</link>
	<description>Pointing out the obvious in today's society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:49:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Williams</title>
		<link>http://blatantreality.com/2008/07/30/barack-obamas-lovehate-relationship-with-toxic-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatantreality.com/2008/07/30/barack-obamas-lovehate-relationship-with-toxic-mercury/#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rex Manning:&lt;br /&gt;
hmmm...I&#039;m reading what I wrote and I didn&#039;t mention mercury as an air pollutant at all. What I was pointing out is that even though Obama stated that he wants to &quot;protect our children from health hazards and developmental disabilities caused by environmental toxins, such as lead, mercury,&quot; his policy would put them at a higher risk of coming in contact with it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You might try to argue that the reduction of energy use caused by using these bulbs will negate any harmful affects but when the EPA recommends you evacuate a room for 15-30 mins after you break a CFL, that&#039;s a hard argument to support. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While I am well aware of the proper procedure of how to clean up one of these bulbs if it breaks, I doubt too many other people know. Who knows how many people have unknowingly cleaned up a broken CFL and disposed of it as if it was a broken incandescent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All I&#039;m saying is that having mercury filled products in confined spaces (like a house) will increase everyone&#039;s risk of coming into direct contact with mercury, including our children. With incandescents being banned and the only alternative are CFL&#039;s, contact with mercury could become a very common thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, in case you were wondering, the reasons I used the first quoted paragraph even though it was talking about mercury as an air pollutant was 1) it referred to it as &quot;toxic mercury&quot; and 2) it brought up the fact about China, which I thought was ironic given the fact that they produce CFL&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex Manning:<br />
hmmm&#8230;I&#8217;m reading what I wrote and I didn&#8217;t mention mercury as an air pollutant at all. What I was pointing out is that even though Obama stated that he wants to &#8220;protect our children from health hazards and developmental disabilities caused by environmental toxins, such as lead, mercury,&#8221; his policy would put them at a higher risk of coming in contact with it.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p>You might try to argue that the reduction of energy use caused by using these bulbs will negate any harmful affects but when the EPA recommends you evacuate a room for 15-30 mins after you break a CFL, that&#8217;s a hard argument to support. </p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p>While I am well aware of the proper procedure of how to clean up one of these bulbs if it breaks, I doubt too many other people know. Who knows how many people have unknowingly cleaned up a broken CFL and disposed of it as if it was a broken incandescent.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p>All I&#8217;m saying is that having mercury filled products in confined spaces (like a house) will increase everyone&#8217;s risk of coming into direct contact with mercury, including our children. With incandescents being banned and the only alternative are CFL&#8217;s, contact with mercury could become a very common thing.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p>Also, in case you were wondering, the reasons I used the first quoted paragraph even though it was talking about mercury as an air pollutant was 1) it referred to it as &#8220;toxic mercury&#8221; and 2) it brought up the fact about China, which I thought was ironic given the fact that they produce CFL&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Manning</title>
		<link>http://blatantreality.com/2008/07/30/barack-obamas-lovehate-relationship-with-toxic-mercury/comment-page-1/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatantreality.com/2008/07/30/barack-obamas-lovehate-relationship-with-toxic-mercury/#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>I take it you don&#039;t realise that burning the extra fossil fuel to power a normal lightbulb puts more mercury into the air than is present in a CFL bulb?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/home_journal_news/4217864.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;See here&lt;/a&gt;

CFL bulbs reduce mercury pollution. Sorry, mate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it you don&#8217;t realise that burning the extra fossil fuel to power a normal lightbulb puts more mercury into the air than is present in a CFL bulb?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/home_journal_news/4217864.html" rel="nofollow">See here</a></p>
<p>CFL bulbs reduce mercury pollution. Sorry, mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
